LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2002)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:50:59 -0400
Reply-To:   Michael Kruger <aa3657@wayne.edu>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Michael Kruger <aa3657@wayne.edu>
Organization:   WSU
Subject:   Re: Understanding logistic output - OR of 9564
Comments:   To: Martin Sherman <MSherman@loyola.edu>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Martin, In examinign LR results it is very important to look at the 95% CI no matter how large the OR is or if the significance value is less than 0.05. Convention is that if the 95% CI includes the value of 1.0 then the variable is not considered a useful predictor of the dichotomous outocme variable you are trying to predict.

Martin Sherman wrote:

> Dear list, > > I got the following output from a multiple logistic regression (SPSS11.0)and I am not sure how to explain the results. Two variables were entered (stepwise) into the equation, yet one of the variables has a significance level of .711 with an Exp(B) of 9564 and a 95% CI of .00 to 1.02E+25. In addition, there is a variable which is not included but which has a significance of .004 (it is included in the list of variables not in the equation). Could multicollinearity explain why this is happening. TIA > > martin sherman

-- "Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot".

Michael Kruger "A True Prince" Statistical Analyst Wayne State Univ.School of Medicine Dept. of OB/Gyn (313)-577-1794


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page