LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2002)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:05:56 +0100
Reply-To:   Jeremy Miles <jnvm1@york.ac.uk>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Jeremy Miles <jnvm1@york.ac.uk>
Subject:   Re: Gender codes
Comments:   To: "Beckman, Anthony" <Anthony_Beckman@URMC.Rochester.edu>
In-Reply-To:   <4FF126AF9EE8D4118D720003470BE9E103BA46E1@exmc4.urmc.roches ter.edu>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 15:41 10/04/02, Beckman, Anthony wrote: >Greetings All > >I am looking at some code that was given to me for help in learning SPSS. I >see within it a few lines of syntax that transforms gender values from 1= >female and 2 = male to -1 = female and 1 = male. > >Any specific reasons why someone might do this? Does it help in running >regressions?

Yes, using -1 and +1 is a type of coding for using categorical variables in regression analysis - this is usually referred to as effect coding. Using this method, the intercept becomes the mean of the DV.

Have a look at a book on regression for more info (or do a web search, that would probably do the trick).

JM

Jeremy Miles mailto:jnvm1@york.ac.uk http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~jnvm1/ Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD *** New phone number: 01904 321375, *** Mobile: 07941 228018


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page