LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2002, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:32:31 -0800
Reply-To:     Cassell.David@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "David L. Cassell" <Cassell.David@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV>
Subject:      Re: Oracle vs. SAS tools
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Chris Smith <cpsmith@VECTREN.COM> wrote: > A consultant working for my company said to me..."Not too many people using > SAS anymore...everyone uses Oracle now." > > What did he mean? > . . . . .

Well, sometimes that means "I know Oracle. I don't know SAS. I only recommend stuff which will get me business." :-)

Oracle does do more business than SAS. So does Microsoft, but that doesn't mean "Not too many people using SAS anymore...everyone uses MS now." I'm sure there are areas where Oracle is making inroads.. but there may be places where the reverse is true. In my little cornfield, we have junked Oracle completely, and we do the database management in SAS now. But we don't have a need for real-time transaction-processing. I'm sure others have junked SAS and just write Oracle programs to generate their descriptive statistics.

David -- David Cassell, CSC Cassell.David@epa.gov Senior computing specialist mathematical statistician


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page