Date:         Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:51:36 -0500
Reply-To:     Roger Lustig <rlustig@CBDCREDIT.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Roger Lustig <rlustig@CBDCREDIT.COM>
Organization: Creative Business Decisions, Inc.
Subject:      Re: Spammed?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

I'm not subscribed to SAS-L, and never have been.  I read the newsgroup.
  And, yes, I got spammed by Visby at both addresses I've posted from in
recent years.

Last month I got the same spam from "David Lewis (Extension 34)",
clearly just a few desks over in the spamatorium.

Now, what could be so hush-hush about that job, I wonder?

Roger

Fehd, Ronald J. wrote:

>>From: Walter Scott [mailto:Walter.Scott@STATE.TN.US]
>>... Or, possibly, he just got one or more weeks folders
>>from the archives and pulled addresses from the headers.
>>     Is there that big a demand for SAS Administrators that
>>someone would go to that trouble?  Why not just post to the
>>list?  Doesn't make a lot of sense.
>>
>
> ah, yes, the ClueLess.
> I got this one, too.
>
> The most famous story I remember was a head-hunter looking for folks with
> MARCOS
> experience.
>
> The specs did not include 'good poofreading skills';
> go figure.
>
> Ron Fehd  the macros maven  CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2@cdc.gov
> ..............^^^^^^
> Bureaucracy at its worst is better than bureaucracy at its best
> -- Plato, in Beetle Bailey comic strip, 1985Mar01
>