Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:51:36 -0500
Reply-To: Roger Lustig <rlustig@CBDCREDIT.COM>
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From: Roger Lustig <rlustig@CBDCREDIT.COM>
Organization: Creative Business Decisions, Inc.
Subject: Re: Spammed?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
I'm not subscribed to SAS-L, and never have been. I read the newsgroup.
And, yes, I got spammed by Visby at both addresses I've posted from in
Last month I got the same spam from "David Lewis (Extension 34)",
clearly just a few desks over in the spamatorium.
Now, what could be so hush-hush about that job, I wonder?
Fehd, Ronald J. wrote:
>>From: Walter Scott [mailto:Walter.Scott@STATE.TN.US]
>>... Or, possibly, he just got one or more weeks folders
>>from the archives and pulled addresses from the headers.
>> Is there that big a demand for SAS Administrators that
>>someone would go to that trouble? Why not just post to the
>>list? Doesn't make a lot of sense.
> ah, yes, the ClueLess.
> I got this one, too.
> The most famous story I remember was a head-hunter looking for folks with
> The specs did not include 'good poofreading skills';
> go figure.
> Ron Fehd the macros maven CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2@cdc.gov
> Bureaucracy at its worst is better than bureaucracy at its best
> -- Plato, in Beetle Bailey comic strip, 1985Mar01