LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (December 2001, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:21:11 -0800
Reply-To:   Cassell.David@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "David L. Cassell" <Cassell.David@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV>
Subject:   Re: Clinical trials NOT using SAS?
Content-type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Roland <roland.rashleigh-berry@VIRGIN.NET> rather rudely replied to Ace: > [Ace] >> <dons flameproof suit> >> There are many advantages to this, not least that it tends to take the >> design and programming further away from the statisticians and into >> the hands of proper IT people, where it belongs. > > I couldn't agree with you more. The way statisticians write SAS code reminds > me of the drawings 6 year old children show their parents. "Oh yes dear, > that's LOVELY. What is it? Oh yes, I see it now. Yes, it looks just like > one. That's VERY good".

I have no complaint with Ace's comment. If one is paying IT personnel to do their jobs, then one should not be letting others muck about there.

HOWEVER, I do object to Roland's slap in the face. Roland, let me ask you in this public forum: When have you had grounds to criticize the code put up on the list by me? Or Dale McLerran? Or any of the other statisticians who participate in this list/newsgroup? I find your remarks insulting, and my formerly-high opinion of you is considerably reduced.

David -- David Cassell, CSC Cassell.David@epa.gov Senior computing specialist mathematical statistician


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page