LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (December 2001, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:26:53 -0600
Reply-To:   fred.x.gehm@HOUSEHOLD.COM
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Fred Gehm <fred.x.gehm@HOUSEHOLD.COM>
Subject:   Re: VB.NET vs. SAS
Comments:   To: Roland <roland.rashleigh-berry@VIRGIN.NET>
Content-type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Right now, SAS and VB serve different goals. There is no reason not to use both. Even assuming microsoft pulls off VB.NET (and there is no assurance they will, VB.NET is still in beta and a lot of VB people HATE it) there is still a need for the kind of thing SAS does well. I don't even see the market diminishing.

Besides the competitors to VB.NET that have been mentioned here already. there is a company (I don't remember it's name) that is working to build add ons to Unix or Lunix that would allow you to pump information into it the way windows allows you to pump information into to the API. Also, there is something called Curl ( owned by the Curl Corporation) that is supposed to reduce web development time by a factor of 80 or so. If true, that could cook VB's goose or maybe goose VB. I wish both of these companies good luck. The micropigs should have been broken into parts.

Fred


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page