LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2001, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2001 22:58:12 GMT
Reply-To:   "Andrew H. Karp" <sfbay0001@AOL.COMNOSPAM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "Andrew H. Karp" <sfbay0001@AOL.COMNOSPAM>
Organization:   AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject:   Re: stacking large numbers of data sets

I've looked through the various and very elegant macro solutions proposed for this problem.

What are the benefits of using the SET statement in a data step vs. writing a PROC APPEND task (or PROC DATASETS with the APPEND statement) in a macro? From my perspective, and depending on the number of observations to be processed, an append is preferable to the SET statement in a data step.

SAS documentation asserts that concatenation is more efficient in V8 than it was in V6.

Comments?

Thanks, Andrew

***************************** Andrew H. Karp Sierra Information Services, Inc. A SAS Institute Quality Partner in the USA 19229 Sonoma Highway PMB 264 Sonoma, CA 95476 USA 707/996-7380 (voice) SierraInfo@AOL.COM http://www.SierraInformation.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page