| Date: | Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:40:39 -0600 |
| Reply-To: | Jonathan Goldberg <jonathan@MATLOCK.WUSTL.EDU> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | Jonathan Goldberg <jonathan@MATLOCK.WUSTL.EDU> |
| Subject: | Re: OT: Grammar (non-SAS) |
|
| Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
|---|
This thread has made me think that I must have had a
"progressive" education. I've never heard of almost all the rules
mentioned. The latest gap in my grammer is Paul D's "Sequence of
Tenses." I've no idea what that is.
I find his example hard to follow. He wrote:
>in The Future Tense conditionals. In other words, at my school, it would
>be
>equal to a crime to utter a phrase like 'If I will do this, you will do
>that.' or 'when I will arrive, greet me.' - 'If I do this...' and 'When I
>have arrived...' would have to be used instead. In other words, the
>conditional part would have to be used in the Present Tense.
He suggests that the rule is obsolete. However, his examples following
the rule: 'If I do this...' instead of 'If I will do this' and 'When I
have arrived...' instead of 'when I will arrive' are in fact what I would
expect to hear. What rule it violates I don't know, but 'when I will
arrive' sounds all wrong. So, in fact, does the other.
So, just out of curiousity, could I ask you to state the "Sequence of
Tenses" rule?
Jonathan Goldberg
Missouri Alcoholism Research Center
Dept. of Psychiatry
Washington University School of Medicine
40 N. Kingshighway, Suite One
St. Louis, MO 63108
314-286-2212
|