LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2001, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:40:39 -0600
Reply-To:   Jonathan Goldberg <jonathan@MATLOCK.WUSTL.EDU>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Jonathan Goldberg <jonathan@MATLOCK.WUSTL.EDU>
Subject:   Re: OT: Grammar (non-SAS)
Comments:   cc: paul_dorfman@HOTMAIL.COM
Content-Type:   TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

This thread has made me think that I must have had a "progressive" education. I've never heard of almost all the rules mentioned. The latest gap in my grammer is Paul D's "Sequence of Tenses." I've no idea what that is.

I find his example hard to follow. He wrote:

>in The Future Tense conditionals. In other words, at my school, it would >be >equal to a crime to utter a phrase like 'If I will do this, you will do >that.' or 'when I will arrive, greet me.' - 'If I do this...' and 'When I >have arrived...' would have to be used instead. In other words, the >conditional part would have to be used in the Present Tense.

He suggests that the rule is obsolete. However, his examples following the rule: 'If I do this...' instead of 'If I will do this' and 'When I have arrived...' instead of 'when I will arrive' are in fact what I would expect to hear. What rule it violates I don't know, but 'when I will arrive' sounds all wrong. So, in fact, does the other.

So, just out of curiousity, could I ask you to state the "Sequence of Tenses" rule?

Jonathan Goldberg Missouri Alcoholism Research Center Dept. of Psychiatry Washington University School of Medicine 40 N. Kingshighway, Suite One St. Louis, MO 63108 314-286-2212


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page