LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (October 2001, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:40:46 -0500
Reply-To:     Jay Weedon <jweedon@EARTHLINK.NET>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Jay Weedon <jweedon@EARTHLINK.NET>
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com
Subject:      Re: dscale or pscale: Proc Genmod
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On 29 Oct 01 22:26:45 GMT, wschlech@ktc.com (Warren Schlechte) wrote:

>In Genmod, you can specify overdispersed model errors with the pscale and >dscale options. How do you decide which one is the more proper for any >situation? How does one report results if the results of the hypothesis >tests change depending upon which scale term is used? For example, in one >model that I examined, the follow were the results: > > > Contrast Estimate SE Alpha Confidence Limits Chi-Sq Prob>Chi-Sq >NOSCALE 10K-Control -1.0151 0.4682 > 0.05 -1.9326 -0.0975 4.70 0.0301 > >DSCALE 10K-Control -1.0151 0.6818 0.05 -2.3514 >0.3212 2.22 0.1365 > >PSCALE 10K-Control -1.0151 0.5654 0.05 -2.1233 >0.0931 3.22 0.0726

Perhaps the proof of the pudding is in the residuals. If adding an overdispersion parameter reduces the number of large residuals, then you should consider keeping it.

FWIW, JW


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page