LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (July 2001, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:00:09 +0200
Reply-To:     "Tribius, Heide" <Heide.Tribius@KFW.DE>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Tribius, Heide" <Heide.Tribius@KFW.DE>
Subject:      Re: Means Question
Comments: To: Darran Zenger <DZENGER@KLUNE.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

If it's possible I never would use more than PROC REPORT, unless I had a relly huge dataset and the examination of CPU-time shows me, that PROC REPORT doesn't work most efficient. (Sometimes it's a good idea to use an Proc Sort before ...) With two proc steps: SAS has to read the data twice and this (normally) isn't efficient.

have a nice weekend (in Germany it's 6 pm and time to go home). Heide


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page