LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (May 2001, week 1)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 1 May 2001 06:41:45 -0700
Reply-To:     "Stanley A. Gorodenski" <vvgsgor@DE.STATE.AZ.US>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Stanley A. Gorodenski" <vvgsgor@DE.STATE.AZ.US>
Subject:      Re: January 1, 1960
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I was afraid this might be the reason, but did not want to explicitly state it.

Stan

"Paula M. Adkins" wrote:

> >My questions are just the opposite. Why did SAS choose 1960 as > >their base? > > John, as I recall from when I took the "SAS Fundamentals: A Programming > Approach" class, the reason why SAS chose 1960 as their base is because > January 1, 1960, is the date Dr. Jim Goodnight, founder of SAS, developed > SAS on an IBM system. A SAS date value is interpreted as the number of days > between January 1, 1960, and that date. For example: > > 01JAN1959 ---> -365 > 01JAN1960 ---> 0 > 01JAN1961 ---> 365 > > Hope this helps! > > Paula M. Adkins, Risk Analyst I > Risk & Source Management Dept. > CheckFree Corporation > 6000 Perimeter Drive > Dublin, OH 43017 > 614-564-3117, 614-564-4308-fax > www.checkfree.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page