LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2001)Back to main SPSSX-L pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Tue, 1 May 2001 11:34:03 -0400
Reply-To:   "Edgar F. Johns" <efjmoj@MEDIAONE.NET>
Sender:   "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <SPSSX-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   "Edgar F. Johns" <efjmoj@MEDIAONE.NET>
Subject:   Re: Factor Analysis
Comments:   To: David Brown <david_brown123@YAHOO.CA>
In-Reply-To:   <20010501134927.76241.qmail@web10905.mail.yahoo.com>

David Brown asks whether factor analysis (FA) and principal component analysis (PCA) are the same or different.

I'd like to log in on the side that says they're different - mathematically and conceptually. Mathematically, the big difference is how the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix are treated. In PCA, the 1's are retained. In FA, the 1's are replaced with a commonality estimate (greater than 0 and less than 1).

Conceptually, PCA is a "data reduction" technique - a way of reducing the number of variables to consider. FA, on the other hand, is a technique for "discovering" the underlying structure (i.e., constructs) that comprises a set of variables.

In practice, they're treated as the same.

Edgar _____ Edgar F. Johns <EdgarJohns@obik.com> Obik, LLC 2906 River Meadow Circle Canton, MI 48188 Tel. 734.495.1292, Fax 734.495.1981 http://www.obik.com

[snip]


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SPSSX-L page