| Date: | Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:05:27 -0700 |
| Reply-To: | "William W. Viergever" <wwvierg@ATTGLOBAL.NET> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | "William W. Viergever" <wwvierg@ATTGLOBAL.NET> |
| Subject: | Re: ICD9 to CPT Codes |
|
| In-Reply-To: | <20010419140740.F9265@navel.introspect> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
|---|
At 02:07 PM 4/19/2001 -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:34:44PM -0400, Ephraim Shapiro
>(ephraim.shapiro@NYU.EDU) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am working with Medicaid data that contains ICD9 codes but need
> > to do analysis based on CPT codes. Does anyone know of any mapping
> > tables or software that's available for free (or at least relatively
> > low-cost) to perform this conversion?
> > Thank you in advance for any information on this.
>
>They're different beasts.
True
> There is no mapping.
Can't remember where, *BUT* there have been partial, lose, mappings.
>ICD9 codes are diagnostic codes.
Don't forget the ICD-9 Proc codes - it's these that tend to map to CPT's
especially if you've a reliably exogenous measure of Place and/or Type of
Service.
Ephraim, let this post hang out for awhile as there are other folks here on
the List who I think might respond, but are more Eastern-based than us here
in California at 5:05 PM.
> CPT-4 codes are treatment codes. While there is typically a relationship
> between diagnosis and treatment,
>one cannot be determined from the other.
>
>--
>Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
> What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
> http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
William W. Viergever Voice : (916) 483-8398
Viergever & Associates Fax : (916) 486-1488
A SAS Institute Quality Partner (USA) E-mail : wwvierg@attglobal.net
Sacramento, CA 95825
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|