LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2000, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2000 16:50:28 -0000
Reply-To:   sashole@bellsouth.net
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Paul Dorfman <paul_dorfman@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:   Re: Info - COBOL data descriptions
Comments:   To: peter.crawford@DB.COM
Content-Type:   text/plain; format=flowed

Peter,

I agree. Moreover, there are things COB2SAS does not handle besides OCCURS depending on. I have seen problems with REDEFINES when items are redefined inside a complex structure. Plus, COBOL evolves, too (even though it may sound like an oxymoron), and it takes a lot of effort to follow updates and implement respective changes. For this and other reasons, I have quit using the program.

However, the situation is not hopeless. Almost the entire demand for this kind of translation is concentrated in the real-computer world, and most mainframe shops license FILEAID. The latter handles *any* COBOL (including the latest IBM Cobol) and PL/I layout flawlessly, and the folks at Compuware follow updates religiously, this being their bread and butter. Normally, FILEAID is run on-line, but I find its batch version most useful. In particular, given a Cobol or PL/I layout, it produces a file with starts, stops, lengths, and type specifications. Cretaing a SAS "layout" from such a file is a first-grade assignment for a SAS or REXX programmer. As a matter of fact, since FILEAID, as any program having a system-catalogued load module, can be run from a SAS session as a non-SAS proc, the entire things is easily handled by a pretty concise SAS program. For those hating batch, there is a %WINDOW DM interface prompting for the file names and such and spitting the output.

Needless to say, those outside of the S/390 enviroment are out of all such luck.

May you have a very Merry Christmas.

Kind regards, ==================== Paul M. Dorfman Jacksonville, Fl ====================

>From: Peter Crawford <peter.crawford@DB.COM> >Reply-To: Peter Crawford <peter.crawford@DB.COM> >To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU >Subject: Re: Info - COBOL data descriptions >Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 15:03:47 +0100 > >My comments are based on experience with the v6 version of >sas2cob, so things may be better in a v8 version. > >I think the only bit "too optimistic" is hoping that the sas2cob >routines can do the whole job of building the input datastep. > >It seemed to have difficulty handling variable length sections >following "occurs depending on" sections. This limitation was >described in the readme notes with sas2cob. > >This difficulty is probably reasonable as the structure will be in >need of logical "normalisation" rather than expansion within one >data vector. Perhaps OK in the data step data vector, but it >doesn't help analysis, data storage, nor run times. >For example, one customer database held a group of 11fields >repeating up to 366 times (daily positions over the last 12 months). >This normalizes better as a separate table of info for each active >day for the customer, rather than force 11*366 variables into the >customer table along with the thousand other variables. >The big wide table was the original design, which sas2cob nearly delivered! > > > > > > > >Datum: 21/12/2000 13:33 >An: SAS-L@listserv.uga.edu > > > > >Antwort an: ghellrieg@t-online.de > >Betreff: Re: Info - COBOL data descriptions >Nachrichtentext: > > >did you find the old (V6) code? If yes, it should be not a big problem to >take the peace of code out, which reduces the COBOL variables to 8 chars. >You simply can replace the 8 or 7 with the length-limit of SAS V8 >variables. I think there is a kind of redundancy check in the SAS macro, >because sometimes you get redundant names if you cut off some chars. This >problem should not occure now any more, but you can leave this code as it >is. There should be no problem with that. > >I've not seen the code, but I expect no big problems. Am I too optimistic? > > > > > >-- > >Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte >Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail >irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und >vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte >Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. > >This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you >are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) >please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any >unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this >e-mail is strictly forbidden.

_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page