Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:46:13 -0800
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Joanne_Walker@labcorp.com: Re: OT: 'Out of office' messages
(Out of the Office)]
from rjf2@CDC.GOV on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:02:34PM -0500
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:02:34PM -0500, Fehd, Ronald J. (rjf2@CDC.GOV) wrote:
> Joe Kelley usually sets these folks NoMail as soon as the bounces start
> coming in. give the guy a break, he, too may be out of the office.
True, but the responses are going to sender, not the list address. Joe
is probably not seeing them.
> I've looked thru MacroHard Outlook OutOfOffice Wizard and cannot grok how to
> keep from sending these oh-so-polite messages to my lists. I may loose my
> whizard hat for admitting this!
Switch to Debian GNU/Linux / Mutt / Procmail <g>.
Actually, under LookOut, rules are applied in order of appearance. If
your OoO message appears following list disposition, and you're doing
something sane like moving list mail to a special folder, the OoO
message won't apply to list mail. Procmail's mechanism and syntax
differ, but the fundamental principle is the same.
> Ron Fehd the macro maven CDC Atlanta GA USA RJF2@cdc.gov
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM [mailto:kmself@IX.NETCOM.COM]
> > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 2:53 PM
> > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> > Subject: [Joanne_Walker@labcorp.com: Re: OT: 'Out of office' messages
> > (Out of the Office)]
> > This really takes the cake....
> > --
> > Karsten M. Self <email@example.com>
> > http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
> > Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc.
> > http://www.zelerate.org
> > What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is
> > no K5 cabal
> > http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/
> > http://www.kuro5hin.org
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc. http://www.zelerate.org
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal