| Date: | Fri, 10 Nov 2000 03:54:55 +0000 |
| Reply-To: | John Whittington <John.W@MEDISCIENCE.CO.UK> |
| Sender: | "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> |
| From: | John Whittington <John.W@MEDISCIENCE.CO.UK> |
| Subject: | Re: q re margin error |
|
| In-Reply-To: | <E13u0gs-0001OT-00@relay1.netnames.net> |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
|---|
At 17:10 09/11/00 -0600, mwang wrote:
>When the presidental poll results were shown on TV, a margin error of 3 or 4
>was often reported. How was this computed, based on the sample size, or
based
>on percentage result?
Theoretically both - but, in practice (for elections with two predominant
candidates) essentially sample size. The 'margin of error' for a given
sample size varies little over the range of 'percentage results' in the
range, say, of 20% to 80% - hence, in practice, it's really only the sample
size that is relevant for these type of polls.
A (95% confidence interval) margin of error (for the percentage vote of one
candidate) of ('plus or minus') 3% or 4% for for results in the 40-60%
range is quite commonly seen in political polls. Those margins of error
corresponds to a sample sizes of about 1000 and 600 respectively. 'Plus or
minus 2%' is also commonly seen, and that corresponds to a sample size of
around 2400.
The margin of error for the score of an 'outsider' candidate expected only
to get a few percent of the votes would be appreciably smaller than for the
main contenders.
Kind Regards,
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225
Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893
Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: John.W@mediscience.co.uk
Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK mediscience@compuserve.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
|