LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2000, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:24:40 +0200
Reply-To:     Dr Olaf Kruse <olaf.kruse@VST-GMBH.DE>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         Dr Olaf Kruse <olaf.kruse@VST-GMBH.DE>
Subject:      Re: Poisson Vs Negative Binomial Regressions
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"

Ogbonnaya John Nwoha wrote: > How can I determine the better of a poisson regression result and a > negative binomial regression result. Attached are the outputs of an > actual regression. Which one is better?

I didn't study the attachments in detail. But the foremost reason to move from a Poisson- to a Neg-Binomial-model are problems with overdispersion, that usually lead to an underestimation of the variance-terms and confidence-intervals. (It makes your model look more "significant"). As you see from your results, the std.-errors are always higher in the Neg-Binomial-model.

I suppose that you'll receive similar results with respect to the parameter-values and predicted values, if you eliminate all insignificant terms from your Neg-Binomial-model and run the same model as a Poisson.model.

Cheers,

Olaf

+-----------------------------------------------------+ Dr. Olaf Kruse VST -Gesellschaft fuer Versicherungsstatistik Roscherstr. 10 30161 Hannover/FRGermany

mail: Olaf.kruse@vst-gmbh.de phone:++49-511-339 599 21 fax: ++49-511-388 57 13 +-----------------------------------------------------+


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page