LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2000, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:32:08 -0700
Reply-To:     Cassell.David@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "David L. Cassell" <Cassell.David@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV>
Subject:      Re: What is the Difference between CPK & PPK?
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Tom Pruitt wrote [with regard to Cpk and Ppk]: > What is the difference between these 2 indexes?

The difference is more-or-less the difference between the estimated variance and the expected variance. They will produce similar numbers [most of the time] but they mean different things.

Cpk [and the related capability indices like Cp and Cr] should be used when you want to work with the *estimated* sigma, and you want to measure the capability of your system to meet the needs of the customer or consumer.

Ppk [and the related indices like pp and Pr] should be used when you want to work with the *calculated* sigma (the sigma based on the individual observations) and you want to measure the actual performance of your system to meet the stated [customer or consumer] needs. So use Ppk when you want to measure the system's *real* performance.

David -- David Cassell, OAO Corp. Cassell.David@epa.gov Senior computing specialist mathematical statistician


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page