LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2000, week 5)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:10:58 -0500
Reply-To:     "Lambert, Bob" <Bob_Lambert@AFCC.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         "Lambert, Bob" <Bob_Lambert@AFCC.COM>
Subject:      Re: Disastrous performance in V8 cf V6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I know that a memory upgrade was done on one of our UNIX boxes because V8 caused the performance to drop. i.e.--SAS jobs took much longer to complete, especially during peak periods.

> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Dunn [SMTP:Stephen_D@HWAY.CO.UK] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:09 AM > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Disastrous performance in V8 cf V6 > > We run a middling size SAS database (one large table > of 10million rows, a few others of 100,000s rows) on an NT server which we > have just converted to using V8 software and V8 table formats from V6. The > database updates are now taking much longer than before and its > performance on queries is much worse. The difficulty seems to be around > accessing files in index order rather than physical order - in some cases > this is taking almost ten times as long as V6 used to on the same data in > V6 formats. Even the simple act of reading a file using an index as BY > variables after a SET statement is painfully slow. > > Has anyone had similar experiences? If so, is it curable? > > Stephen Dunn > Highway Insurance Statistician > Tel (01277 266) 253 >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page