Date:         Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:20:23 +0100
Reply-To:     David Johnson <David.Johnson@UK.ROYALSUN.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         David Johnson <David.Johnson@UK.ROYALSUN.COM>
Subject:      Best papers at SEUGI
Comments: To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.VT.EDU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Arising from some discussion with my fellow travellers last wek:

Scoring of presentations at SEUGI involved marking a number of criteria in
ranges from bad to very good.  The criteria included one on 'innovative use of
the SAS System'.

Since this criterion will favour new applications, does anyone have any strong
feelings either way regarding
  sound presentations on
  existing techniques
  well applied
being disadvantaged in their scoring?

I'll share a summary of private replies to the list at the end of the week.

David