LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2000, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:33:33 +0200
Reply-To:   Louis Broekhuijsen <louis.broekhuijsen@CMG.NL>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Louis Broekhuijsen <louis.broekhuijsen@CMG.NL>
Subject:   Re: Best papers at SEUGI
Comments:   To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.VT.EDU
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear David,

And also, not all moderators were as keen to distribute the evaluation forms amongst the audience.

Kind regards,

Louis Broekhuijsen -----Original Message----- From: David Johnson [mailto:David.Johnson@UK.ROYALSUN.COM] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 11:20 AM To: SAS-L@AKH-WIEN.AC.AT Subject: Best papers at SEUGI

Arising from some discussion with my fellow travellers last wek:

Scoring of presentations at SEUGI involved marking a number of criteria= in ranges from bad to very good. The criteria included one on 'innovative= use of the SAS System'.

Since this criterion will favour new applications, does anyone have any= strong feelings either way regarding sound presentations on existing techniques well applied being disadvantaged in their scoring?

I'll share a summary of private replies to the list at the end of the w= eek.

David =

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page
listserv.uga.edu
Enterprise Information Technology Services
The University of Georgia
listhelp@uga.edu