Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 01:11:32 -0700
Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Version 8 for PC Windows slows down dramatically, file full
In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from icj808@USWEST.NET on Fri, Jun 09,
2000 at 11:16:47PM -0400
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 11:16:47PM -0400, paula wrote:
> Problem 1.
> When referencing a library to a network drive, with 45GB left, say, E:\sas\,
> instead of c:\sas,
> whichever step is be executed, the CPU usage ranges from 7% to 42% all the
> When the library is referenced back to C drive, the job is finished quickly.
> Is this because of the pipe width of my lan or I should use a server version
> of the software?
Accessing datasets (a SAS library) over a network is likely to be 100
to 1000 times slower than running an equivalent job referencing local
> problem 2
> after letting the steps running for 3 hours, SAS posed "out of resources".
> Log said the "file is full". Well, I have about 40GB left on the E drive.
> Which file is full that SAS is talking about? Once I switched to C drive,
> nothing crashed like this.
What is your actual file allocation on the remote disk? Most networked
disk access puts quota restrictions on the amount of data an individual
user can allocate.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
Evangelist, Opensales, Inc. http://www.opensales.org
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0