LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (May 2000, week 4)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 22 May 2000 08:51:06 -0700
Reply-To:     dave_h <hapeman@JUNO.COM>
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         dave_h <hapeman@JUNO.COM>
Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
Subject:      Re: SAS certification vs. MCSE vs. coca vending machine

Greetings, I would like to add my opinion. First of I am do not have any of the certifications from SAS. The major reason why is the cost. At $150 per exam, I'll wait til one of my employers wants to foot the bill. I have been a CQE and a CRE of the ASQ. And I am currently a Master SAS Programmer of Brainbench, which is free. My opinion is that SAS is such a broad topic, that a test could not accurately be the sole judge. The exams I have taken are set to cover the broad sectrum of the subject. To do well, one must know the areas that the exam makers deem important to their specified depth. For example, on the Brainbench exam there werew several questions about proc tabulate. I rarely use proc tabulate. Also there were questions about how to read a text file. I read input from Oracle databases, not text files. One of these days, I'll break down and pay for the exams probably. I would recommend that anyone starting out in the business, take the exams. They won't hurt you, and in some peoples eyes may help you. As far as your second statement, I disagree that with your idea that good statisticians are good SAS programmers, but not the reverse. The two things have a great deal that are not in common. Most statisticians know only enough SAS to accomplish their particular specialized analysis. They would be lost if they were taken from their comfort zone. A good SAS programmer without a Statistical background, can program anything. However, they could not interpret what the numbers mean though. The ideal person I think you would like is a hybrid. What you want is someone who has a masters degree in Statistics, and has gone beyond that to learn proc sql, macros, SAS/graph, Advanced data step tools, SAS connect to databases, etc. If I have been preaching to the chior, I apologize. i look forward to continuing this discussion.

Dave

* Sent from AltaVista http://www.altavista.com Where you can also find related Web Pages, Images, Audios, Videos, News, and Shopping. Smart is Beautiful


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page