LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (February 2000, week 3)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:32:28 -0500
Reply-To:     DEppler@SARALEE.COM
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:         DEppler@SARALEE.COM
Subject:      Processing efficiency
Comments: To: SAS-L@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I have a SAS dataset of historical orders (cust_nbr/ordr_nbr/order-form line #/style) sorted by cust # & order # with @70 million rows. I have another SAS dataset of styles/product category/product category code with @12,000 rows. I am creating a report showing the number of combinations of product categories present within an individual order and then ranking them by most common occurrence of combinations.

My Question: Is there a point where a merge becomes more efficient than a format?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page