LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2000, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Tue, 8 Feb 2000 10:27:30 -0500
Reply-To:   Lary Jones <ljones@BINGHAMTON.EDU>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Lary Jones <ljones@BINGHAMTON.EDU>
Subject:   Re: Missing Values; was PROC MEANS question
In-Reply-To:   <4.2.2.20000208092323.00b03640@mail.binghamton.edu>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 09:56 AM 2/8/2000 -0500, Lary Jones wrote: ... >First of all, it is often forgotten that deciding to replace missing values >depends on the assumption that the missing values occur randomly. I think >this rarely happens. ...

Let me add the following to my previous note.

My background in social psychology and measurement has made me into a bit of a curmudgeon about replacement of missing values. I would be most interested to hear the opinions of others. In my woeful ignorance of recent literature, I wonder if anyone has developed a technique for assessing the randomness of missing values within the rectangular array of a list of variables over all the subjects. My opinion is that missing value replacement is only justified if we know that the pattern of missing values is haphazard (unrelated to the row or column of the data matrix).

I will be researching this, but would appreciate any knowledge that others might have.

_______________________________________________________ Lary Jones % Statistical Computing Analyst Computing Services % .......................... Binghamton University % LJones@Binghamton.EDU Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 % (607) 777-2614


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page