LISTSERV at the University of Georgia
Menubar Imagemap
Home Browse Manage Request Manuals Register
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2000, week 2)Back to main SAS-L pageJoin or leave SAS-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:   Sat, 15 Jan 2000 00:01:01 GMT
Reply-To:   Lou Pogoda <lpogoda@HOME.NOSPAM.COM>
Sender:   "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
From:   Lou Pogoda <lpogoda@HOME.NOSPAM.COM>
Organization:   @Home Network
Subject:   Re: filenames on WinNT

Well, I took a couple of minutes at lunch today and tried it out.

I put a very short SAS program into a file called 'this is a long file name.sas' and tried to run it.

Issuing SAS THIS IS A LONG FILE NAME just got me a bunch of error messages. Issuing SAS "THIS IS A LONG FILE NAME" ran the program. And the resulting log showed up in explorer as "this is a long file name.log".

The office uses Win95, not NT, but I wouldn't expect the results to be *vastly* different.

John Whittington wrote in message <3.0.1.32.20000114010328.00740478@pop3.powernet.co.uk>... >At 00:31 14/01/00 GMT, Lou Pogoda wrote: > >>DOS may be "stupid" but it's not quite that stupid. > >Indeed > >>If you do a DIR, you'll see the file listed as THISIS~1. But if you open >>windows explorer and look at the file name there, you'll see it listed as >>"this is a long file name" (without the quotes, of course). > >You don't even have to do that, actually. Using Don's filename, I create a >diddy file, and herewith the DOS DIR listing: > > Volume in drive C has no label > Volume Serial Number is 263B-15ED > Directory of C:\temp3 > >. <DIR> 09/01/97 15:39 . >.. <DIR> 09/01/97 15:39 .. >HBSPHY~1 LOG 22 14/01/00 0:54 HBSPHYSQ211.LOG > 1 file(s) 22 bytes > 2 dir(s) 426,868,736 bytes free > >... the long filename is there as well as the truncated short one. > >>So, I'm guessing here (I'm at home and don't have SAS on this machine) but a >>couple of possibilities come to mind: >>1. The file really does have the name HBSPHYSQ211.LOG, it just doesn't show >>up that way on a DOS directory command > >That certainly is my suspicion. The fact that it was being called >HBSPHY~2.log strongly suggests that this is a 'short-form truncation' of a >long filename of which DOS *is* aware. > >... that's how I se it, anyway! > >Regards, > > >John > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225 >Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893 >Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: John.W@mediscience.co.uk >Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK mediscience@compuserve.com >----------------------------------------------------------------


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SAS-L page