Table of contents:

• A good basic key? (4 messages)
• Couple of questions on Neptunea names (3 messages)
• Donald T. Bosch
• E-Mail Needed
• FW: [CONCH-L] A good basic key? (4 messages)
• Great clip on octopus/bioluminescence (3 messages)
• Huge shells (mollusks) (2 messages)
• RES: [CONCH-L] Huge shells (mollusks)
• These stowaways have been laying low for a while... (7 messages)
• West Pacific Lottiidae (2 messages)

1. A good basic key?
   • A good basic key? (71 lines)
     From: Ellen Bulger <xenophora@GMAIL.COM>
   • Re: A good basic key? (128 lines)
     From: Allen Aigen <serirach@JUNO.COM>
   • Re: A good basic key? (203 lines)
     From: Peggy Williams <peggy@SHELLTRIPS.COM>
   • Re: A good basic key? (39 lines)
     From: Ellen Bulger <xenophora@GMAIL.COM>

2. Couple of questions on Neptunea names
   • Couple of questions on Neptunea names (63 lines)
     From: Paul Monfils <paulcyp@COX.NET>
   • Re: Couple of questions on Neptunea names (45 lines)
     From: Martin H. Eastburn <lionslair@CONSOLIDATED.NET>
   • Re: Couple of questions on Neptunea names (25 lines)
     From: Paul Monfils <paulcyp@COX.NET>

3. Donald T. Bosch
   • Donald T. Bosch (90 lines)
     From: Franck Frydman <rf-j-rf@WANADOO.FR>

4. E-Mail Needed
   • E-Mail Needed (66 lines)
     From: CEShell@AOL.COM

5. FW: [CONCH-L] A good basic key?
   • FW: [CONCH-L] A good basic key? (74 lines)
     From: Katherine Cordy <corshell@EARTHLINK.NET>
   • Re: FW: [CONCH-L] A good basic key? (52 lines)
     From: Ellen Bulger <xenophora@GMAIL.COM>
   • Re: FW: [CONCH-L] A good basic key? (125 lines)
     From: steve rosenthal <smr914@GMAIL.COM>
   • Re: FW: [CONCH-L] A good basic key? (74 lines)
     From: Ellen Bulger <xenophora@GMAIL.COM>

6. Great clip on octopus/bioluminescence
   • Great clip on octopus/bioluminescence (36 lines)
     From: Vicky Wall <vwall3@EMBARQMAIL.COM>
   • Re: Great clip on octopus/bioluminescence (44 lines)
     From: Martin H. Eastburn <lionslair@CONSOLIDATED.NET>
   • Re: Great clip on octopus/bioluminescence (45 lines)
     From: David Kirsh <mediashun@MINDSPRING.COM>

7. Huge shells (mollusks)
   • Re: Huge shells (mollusks) (182 lines)
     From: Scott Jordan <sjordan2@PRODIGY.NET>
   • Re: Huge shells (mollusks) (87 lines)
     From: Harry G. Lee <shells@HGLEE.COM>

8. RES: [CONCH-L] Huge shells (mollusks)
   • RES: [CONCH-L] Huge shells (mollusks) (41 lines)
     From: Marcus Coltro <marcuscoltro@HOTMAIL.COM>

9. These stowaways have been laying low for a while...
   • These stowaways have been laying low for a while... (32 lines)
     From: Ellen Bulger <xenophora@GMAIL.COM>
   • Re: These stowaways have been laying low for a while... (63 lines)
     From: Harry G. Lee <shells@HGLEE.COM>
   • Re: These stowaways have been laying low for a while... (26 lines)
     From: aydin <gastropod@EARTHLINK.NET>
   • Re: These stowaways have been laying low for a while... (70 lines)
     From: Martin H. Eastburn <lionslair@CONSOLIDATED.NET>
   • Re: These stowaways have been laying low for a while... (57 lines)
     From: John Varner <johnsvarner@MSN.COM>
   • Re: These stowaways have been laying low for a while... (85 lines)
     From: aydin <gastropod@EARTHLINK.NET>
   • Re: These stowaways have been laying low for a while... (137 lines)
     From: Martin H. Eastburn <lionslair@CONSOLIDATED.NET>

10. West Pacific Lottiidae
    • West Pacific Lottiidae (64 lines)
      From: Ron G. Noseworthy <rgnshells@YAHOO.CA>
    • Re: West Pacific Lottiidae (145 lines)
      From: Alan Kohn <kohn@U.WASHINGTON.EDU>